Print

Identification

Field Value

Title

Assessment of River-Flat Eucalypt forest on Coastal floodplains TEC on NSW Crown Forest Estate

Alternative title(s)

River-Flat Eucalypt Forest: Survey, Classification and Mapping Completed for the NSW Environment Protection Authority

Abstract

The operational map for River-flat Eucalypt Forest (RFEF) was constructed to resolve long-standing issues surrounding its identification, location and extent within the NSW State Forest estate covered by the coastal Integrated Forestry Operation Agreements. The map was constructed in two parts, with State Forests to the north of Sydney being mapped in a separate process to those to the south of Sydney. We did this to minimise the risk that relationships between regional vegetation communities and the TEC would be confounded or masked by geographical variation or other major ecological gradients, which might otherwise be a significant risk if we had treated the full latitudinal range of the TEC as a single study area. In total, we assessed 1,218,000 hectares of State Forest across coastal NSW. This consisted of 868,000 hectares of State Forest on the north coast and more than 350,000 hectares of State Forest on the south coast. In both study areas, the project’s Threatened Ecological Community (TEC) Reference Panel (the Panel) preceded the assessment process by reviewing the determination for RFEF and agreeing upon a set of diagnostic parameters for its identification. The Panel found that RFEF is primarily defined by floristic plot data and that it is mostly located on coastal floodplains and associated alluvial landforms. Following on from these conclusions, we started the mapping process by mapping the distribution of floodplains and alluvial soils and thus identifying possible areas of RFEF. For both the north and the south coast we used an existing map of coastal landforms and geology in combination with several fine-scale models of alluvial landform features to determine the likely extent of floodplains and alluvial soils within our study areas. We used aerial photograph interpretation (API) to assess the floristic and structural attributes of the vegetation cover found on our modelled alluvial environments, and thus delineated polygons likely to contain RFEF. We also used API to modify the boundaries of the modelled alluvial areas using a prescribed list of eucalypt, casuarina and melaleuca species in combination with the interpretation of landform elements relevant to alluvial and floodplain environments. We then compiled floristic plot data for all State Forest areas within our modelled alluvial landforms and API polygons. For both the north and the south coast the floristic plot data was sourced from both existing flora surveys held in the OEH VIS database and from targeted flora surveys conducted specifically for this project. We compared these plots with those previously assigned to flora communities listed in the determination of RFEF. Both dissimilarity-based methods and multivariate regression methods were used for the comparison. The results of the comparison were then used to assess the likelihood that the plots in State forests belonged to one or more of the communities listed in the RFEF determination. Following this, we developed a predictive statistical model of the probability of occurrence of RFEF using plot data and a selection of environmental and remote-sensing variables. For the north coast, we used a Random Forest model, while for the south coast we used a Boosted Regression Tree model. To create the operational map, we assigned every mapped API polygon to RFEF if appropriate based on the plot data, over-storey and understorey attributes, landform features and modelled probabilities underlying each API polygon. We mapped 3819 hectares of RFEF on the south coast and 198 hectares of RFEF on the north coast.

Operational TEC Mapping have been derived by API at a viewing scale between 1-4000 using ADS40 50 cm pixel imagery and 1 m derived LIDAR DEM grids for floodplain EECs.

Resource locator

Data Quality Statement

Name: Data Quality Statement

Protocol: WWW:DOWNLOAD-1.0-http--download

Description:

NSW Government standards direct that data should be made available with a statement regarding its quality, a so-called “Data Quality statement (DQS)”, to enable potential users to determine whether the data is suitable for their requirements.

Function: download

Assessment of River-Flat Eucalypt forest on Coastal floodplains TEC on NSW Crown Forest Estate

Name: Assessment of River-Flat Eucalypt forest on Coastal floodplains TEC on NSW Crown Forest Estate

Protocol: WWW:DOWNLOAD-1.0-http--download

Description:

Report on the Assessment of River-Flat Eucalypt forest on Coastal floodplains TEC on NSW Crown Forest Estate

Function: download

Operational Map for River-Flat Eucalypt Forest Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate

Name: Operational Map for River-Flat Eucalypt Forest Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate

Protocol: WWW:DOWNLOAD-1.0-http--download

Description:

Shapefile - Operational map for the Assessment of River-Flat Eucalypt forest on Coastal floodplains TEC on NSW Crown Forest Estate

Function: download

Operational and Indicative Maps for the Assessment of Threatened Ecological Communities on NSW Crown Forest Estate

Name: Operational and Indicative Maps for the Assessment of Threatened Ecological Communities on NSW Crown Forest Estate

Protocol: WWW:DOWNLOAD-1.0-http--download

Description:

ESRI ArcGIS Layer File - Operational and Indicative Maps for the Assessment of Threatened Ecological Communities on NSW Crown Forest Estate

Function: download

Native Forestry Map Viewer

Name: Native Forestry Map Viewer

Protocol: WWW:DOWNLOAD-1.0-http--download

Description:

The EPA Native Forestry Map Viewer enables users to view our Koala and Threatened Ecological Community mapping without the need to access a GIS system. The map viewer allows users to perform searches to locate areas of interest and export resulting map views into various image file formats.

Function: download

Unique resource identifier

Code

a99d3783-f2ac-4c8e-b805-babc6ca02b84

Presentation form

Map digital

Edition

Version 1

Dataset language

English

Metadata standard

Name

ISO 19115

Edition

2016

Dataset URI

https://datasets.seed.nsw.gov.au/dataset/a99d3783-f2ac-4c8e-b805-babc6ca02b84

Purpose

Native Forestry Regulation on State Forests

Status

Completed

Spatial representation

Type

vector

Geometric Object Type

curve

Spatial reference system

Code identifying the spatial reference system

4283

Equivalent scale

1:None

Classification of spatial data and services

Field Value

Topic category

Keywords

Field Value

Keyword set

keyword value

Threatened Ecological Community

Endangered Ecological Community

Vegetation

State Forest

River-Flat Eucalypt Forest

EEC

TEC

Environment Protection Authority

EPA

Originating controlled vocabulary

Title

ANZLIC Search Words

Reference date

2008-05-16

Geographic location

West bounding longitude

149.50438

East bounding longitude

150.77762

North bounding latitude

-37.41703

South bounding latitude

-32.74726

Vertical extent information

Minimum value

-100

Maximum value

2228

Coordinate reference system

Authority code

urn:ogc:def:cs:EPSG::

Code identifying the coordinate reference system

5711

Temporal extent

Begin position

2016-10-01

End position

N/A

Dataset reference date

Resource maintenance

Maintenance and update frequency

Irregular

Contact info

Contact position

Data Broker

Organisation name

Environment Protection Authority (EPA)

Responsible party role

pointOfContact

Quality and validity

Field Value

Lineage

Linework has been derived from manual interpretation of stereoscopic 3D ADS-40 imagery collected at a 50cm resolution. Date of photography varies across eastern NSW between 2009-2015. Interpretation has collected a range of floristic attributes including canopy species dominance, understorey attributes and assessment of landscape characteristics. Lines have been interpreted using a viewing scale between 1:2000- 1: 5000. Interpretation has been supported by field traverse (except bogs and saltmarsh), and existing field based observation data held by OEH. Final linework was assembled using combinations of aerial photo patterns, predictive TEC models, systematic plot data and where relevant fine scale topographic data derived from 1 metre resolution digital elevation model.

Constraints related to access and use

Field Value

Limitations on public access

Data Quality

Field Value

Scope

dataset

DQ Conceptual Consistency

Explanation

Standard API mapping pathways have been established for mappers to apply consistent interpretation of vegetation features including, size criteria and polygon attribution.

DQ Topological Consistency

Explanation

Not assessed

DQ Absolute External Positional Accuracy

Explanation

Positional accuracy for operational maps has been measured using independent assessment of interpreted lines as a mean of 8.5 metres. Other influence on positional accuracy include the accuracy of field based GPS records currently tested at a mean of 9.2 metres. Some error with interpreted line from 2D to 3D environment can result in a positional shift of up to 10 metres.

DQ Non Quantitative Attribute Correctness

Explanation

Attribution is consistent.

Responsible organisations

Field Value

Responsible party

Contact position

Data Broker

Organisation name

Environment Protection Authority (EPA)

Responsible party role

pointOfContact

Metadata on metadata

Field Value

Metadata point of contact

Contact position

Data Broker

Organisation name

Environment Protection Authority (EPA)

Responsible party role

pointOfContact

Metadata date

2024-02-26T15:26:19.590936

Metadata language